Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 06:08
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
How will the newly imposed trade tariffs affect the global economy?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why is our generation so unhappy?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How do I maintain and care for granite countertops in a coastal climate like Pompano Beach?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Algorithm to analyze smartphone app data can predict MS symptoms - Multiple Sclerosis News Today
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
These Diabetes Drugs Are Finding New Life as an Antiaging Hack - WSJ
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
First quantum-mechanical model of quasicrystals reveals why they exist - Phys.org
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
NASA’s Webb Rounds Out Picture of Sombrero Galaxy’s Disk - NASA Science (.gov)